|

Thermotopography
shows ‘enormous promise’
for diagnosis and treatment of eye diseases
Stefanie Petrou-Binder MD
in Berlin
 |
| Sven
Beutelpacher MD |
INITIAL
experience with infrared thermotopography at the Heidelberg University
Eye Clinic in Germany suggests that heat patterns can provide valuable
information for the diagnosis and treatment of a variety of eye
diseases.
“Infrared thermotopography shows promising results as a means
of detecting eye diseases which induce or involve a change in the
temperature of the anterior segment. It can easily detect and visualise
even the smallest differences in the corneal surface temperature
distribution,” Sven Beutelpacher MD told the German Society
of Ophthalmology.
In a study carried out at the Interdisciplinary Uveitis Centre of
the Heidelberg University Eye Clinic, Dr Beutelspacher and his team
used high-resolution and high-speed infrared thermography to study
28 patients with different types of anterior segment inflammation.
The goal of this orientation study was to gain a first impression
of “high resolution and high speed” thermography in
the ocular region.
The investigators used a VarioTHERM camera with a spectral range
of 3.0 to 5.0 mm which uses focal plane array to make images. The
picture frequency was 50 Hz and the temperature resolution around
30°C < 0.1 K (0.01 K mA). The camera has a PtSi-CMOS-Hybris
detector which is cooled by a Stirling-cooler.
 |
Standard
thermotopogram of a left eye of a healthy subject. |
|
Active
untreated iridocyclitis. At the cornea-sclera border a ring
of enhanced thermal activity can be found. |
Eighteen
patients were male and 10 female. Two patients had florid anterior
uveitis; five had recurrent anterior uveitis; one patient had diffuse
scleritis; five had Sicca-Syndrome; and five more had just undergone
cataract surgery and were examined by thermotopography on their
first postoperative day.
Ten otherwise healthy patients examined with this method constituted
the control group.
The left and right eyes of the patients were both photographed 50
times, each within 10 seconds. The images were taken at 50 cm from
the corneal surface at an angle of 15°, with a 100 mm objective.
The room was darkened and set at a temperature of 22°. The environment
was air-conditioned with minimal air movement.
The researchers asked the patients to close the eye they wanted
to examine for 20 seconds before taking the images. They asked them
not to blink in order to avoid discrepancies in the measurements.
Altered readings due to eye movement or blinking were discarded.
The temperature time course, temperature distribution pattern, minimal
temperature, maximal temperature, standard deviation, and the differences
between the measurements were all recorded.
The investigators used Irbis Professional software (Infratec) to
evaluate the readings. They took all the measurements along an axis
running through both lid angles and through the central cornea.
They also took measurements around a vertical axis that went through
the corneal centre and throughout a circular field of the cornea.
The investigators took the measurements two hours after giving eye
drops and dressing the eyes. They did not apply vasoactive medications.
The average corneal temperature of the control group was measured
at 35.4 ± 0.1°C. All the control patients revealed a
mean surface temperature decrease of 1.3°C in 10 seconds.
The iridocyclitis patients revealed a "hot ring" in the
area of the corneal rim above the ciliary body. The temperature
difference between the central cornea and the sclero-corneal interface
was widened (³T 1.8°C). In all, the corneal surface temperatures
in these eyes were 2.2°C higher than in the control group.
The investigators also measured a high temperature zone in patients
with scleritis, due to the increased local circulation.
The eye surface temperature in eyes with ophthalmic herpes zoster
was no higher than in normal eyes. The dendrites, however, were
more apparent due to the minimal temperature difference with the
environment.
The researchers noted a temperature difference of up to 3°C
between eyes which had undergone cataract surgery and non-operated
eyes. The increase in the surface temperature is related to eye
trauma. Furthermore, a more rapid temperature decrease was observed
in the area of the breaking tear film than in neighbouring corneal
zones.
Dr Beutelspacher explained that the pattern of the temperature distribution
on the surface of the eye can offer important diagnostic clues,
shown as early as 1966 by a French study group.
Since then, clinicians seem to have repeatedly re-discovered the
method to aid them in the diagnosis of tumour findings, inflammations
of the anterior eye segment and periorbital region, and for tear
physiology.
Technological advances in the camera system and the use of either
a Stirling motor or other methods of cooling the instruments, as
well as the downsizing of parts, has both simplified the method
and rendered more precise and reliable readings.
Infrared thermotopography is an important differential diagnostic
tool that has become a well-grounded method in other medical disciplines.
It has been employed to control the by-pass circulation during cardiac
surgery and is a means of investigating the differential diagnosis
of peripheral vascular closure.
Infrared thermotopography is implemented in dermatology and for
breast cancer diagnostics. Its role in ophthalmology is still at
the experimental phase, however. According to Dr Beutelspacher,
this method can be useful in the differential diagnosis of eye tumours,
as well as to document the temperature development during refractive
laser surgery of the corneal surface in real time.
Also, infrared phototopography can be used to detect an increase
in corneal temperature during cataract surgery, which allows excellent
visualisation due to the phaco energy, especially in non-pulse mode.
Dr Beutelspacher stressed that these study results reflected only
the first experiences made with infrared thermotopography and that
the immediate relevance of the results was limited since standardising
certain aspects of the method was not possible.
“Although our study design examined the cooling down temperature
of the corneal surface, we later realised that a standard cool down
procedure using a precise quantity of water at a certain temperature
and the use of a lid-opener to study the warming-up phase would
have helped in creating standard conditions and a more reliable
outcome,” he explained.
Sven
Beutelspacher MD
Heidelberg University Eye Clinic, Germany
Email: beutelspacher@web.de
Top |