Conductive
Keratoplasty May Provide Stable Correction of Moderate Hyperopia
Spanish Investigators Find
By
Roibeard O'hEineachain
CANNES-A
new procedure called conductive keratoplasty, which involves inducing
a selective shrinkage of stromal tissue by delivering radio frequency
energy directly to the stromal cornea, appears to bring about a
highly stable and predictable correction of mild-to-moderate hyperopia,
according to Josep L. Guell, MD, Ph.D., who will be presenting his
findings here at the Fifth Winter Refractive Meeting of the ESCRS.
In
21 eyes of 13 patients who underwent conductive keratoplasty with
The ViewPointTM CK System to correct hyperopia ranging from 0.5
D to 3.0 D, 42% were within 0.5 D and 70% were with in 1.0 D of
emmetropia after a mean follow-up of six months (range 2-12 months).
Furthermore, mean un-corrected visual acuity improved from a pre-operative
value of 20/40 to 20/30 and mean best-corrected visual acuity remained
unchanged. Three patients lost one or more lines during the first
two months after surgery said Dr. Guell, Institute of Ocular Microsurgery,
Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain told EuroTimes
in an interview.
The
ViewPointTM CK system delivers controlled-release radio frequency
energy via a 90 µm-wide KeratoplastTM tip. Impedance in the flow
of energy through collagen fibrils increases the tissue temperature
and theoretically induces a stable collagen shrinkage, affording
a predictable and stable correction of hyperopia with little regression.
The KeratoplastTM provides a uniform column of treatment (~100 µm
wide x 500 µm deep) which reaches 80% of stromal depth. Collagen
fibrils theoretically reach a precise 65°C, the optimal temperature
for permanent collagen shrinkage, Dr. Guell explained, adding:
"The
concept of conductive keratoplasty is that you are increasing temperature
enough to contract the collagen fibres without destroying them.
Because if you only contract the collagen fibres, theoretically
it will remain in this situation forever, whereas if you destroy
collagen fibres you will have a substitution of scar tissue which
will return the eye to its pre-operative refraction.
"Furthermore,
conductive keratoplasty distributes the energy equally like cylinder
more deeply into the collagen, instead of using probes that work
from the top like the holmium or erbium laser where you produce
a conic burn which diminishes in proportion to its distance from
the surface. Therefore, again theoretically, it does not depend
so much on the surface of the cornea which varies more between individuals,
so theoretically you increase the predictability with this approach."
The
Barcelona investigators commence the procedure by first applying
a topical anaesthetic, and then stabilising the eyelid with a special
speculum which also serves as the return path for energy. They then
mark the centre of the cornea and make eight radial marks, and three
concentric ring-markings 6 mm, 7mm, and 8mm in diametre. The points
of intersection between the radial marks and the rings identify
the placement points for the Keratoplast tip. Each eye receives
from eight to 32 "shots" from the View point device, depending on
the amount of hyperopia to be corrected.
"The
idea is that you are working on more effective area without going
inside the 6mm optical zone where you are increasing the risk of
irregular astigmatism and not going further than the 8 mm optical
zone where you are increasing the risk of no effect or reverse effect."
The
average age of patients in the study was 42 years (range 31-56)
and most were 40 years or over, he said. Hyperopic patients in that
age group tend to be less concerned with regression have a better
subjective response to the treatment, he noted. During the first
few weeks after treatment, eyes tend to be slightly myopic before
they achieve their final refraction. So far there have been no major
complications, he added.
Dr.
Guell noted that in addition to the theoretical advantages conductive
keratoplasty has over other collagen shrinkage procedures in terms
of predictability and stability, the technique conceptually, also
has several safety advantages over LASIK in the treatment of hyperopia.
"Conductive
keratoplasty offers the surgeon much greater control than LASIK
does because you are the one who is touching the cornea where you
want the effect. You are also not doing any lamellar cut and the
worst refractive complication you can have is regression and induced
regular astigmatism, whereas with LASIK you run the risk of inducing
irreversible irregular astigmatism."
Trials
with the Viewpoint CK system are much further advanced in the United
States, where a phase III seven-centre study has recently been completed
although the device still has only investigational status, he noted.
The Barcelona centre is one of three in the world which are currently
seeking to determine the nomograms for using the conductive keratoplasty
in the treatment of hyperopic astigmatism, he said adding:
"Theoretically
what you will achieve with conductive keratoplasty is the best effect
with the least regression, and while longer follow-up is needed,
so far the results seem to show a correlation with the clinical
results and the theory because in my experience to date stability
is much better than with any of the other lasers I have been using
in hyperopia. On the other hand, we cannot accept the procedure
as a standard treatment until a minimum 18-24 months of follow up
is available and more patients are recruited."
Dr.
Guell's co-authors were Mercedes Vasquez, MD, Chris P. Lohman, MD,
Ph.D, and Francois Malecaze, MD.