ESCRS Homepage

November 2002
IN THIS ISSUE

Wavefront seeks a higher order of vision correction


New laser system for intraoperative measurement of LASIK flap thickness

Visual prostheses use neurotransmitter retinal chips to stimulate retinal function

Wavefront emerges as powerful tool for night vision

Allegretto promising for hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism

Topography's role in wavefront systems

IOP measurement after LASIK may be unreliable

LASEK may only play support on refractive stage

Solid-state laser PRK yields favourable results for myopia

GTS-assisted DLK useful alternative to PK for keratoconus

Glaucoma common after PK bodes poorly for visual outcome

Classic drawbacks of PRK succumb to new strategies

New insight into LASIK dry eye pathogenesis

Use of anti-inflammatories after capsulotomy questioned

Good quality training leads to good quality cataract surgery

One line of regained visual acuity is a snip at just €120

Mitomycin-C provides effective haze prophylaxis

Long-term concerns linger on safety of Mitomycin-C

German politicos promise health reforms

Honey forms biblical basis for corneal oedema

Routine two-step LASIK after PK unnecessary

Plasma knife provides clean and accurate cut for capsulorhexis

Glaucoma therapy targets apoptosis and trabecular meshwork

Viscocanalostomy viable choice for cataract-glaucoma

Device allows needle-free injections into smallest vessels

New river blindness therapy may provide panacea for 18m people

Daytime running lights may soon be compulsory in all EU states

Intracorneal lamellar implants still a questionable option

Aqualase system viable for small incision cataract removal

Unilateral von-Hippel disease with optic nerve head

FEATURES
From The Editor
Reflections on Refractive Surgery
In Your Good Books
An Eye On Travel
Bio-ophthalmology
Outlook on Industry
Regulatory Matters



New europe-wide law to regulate tissue implants

A EUROPE-wide law may soon regulate the harvesting, testing and transplant of tissue, including eye tissue.
Under a new proposal by the European Commission, the European Union's executive body, the EU's 15 member states would introduce comprehensive standards to ensure the safety of tissue donations, the quality of tissue banks and the traceability of tissue.

Quality and Safety
"In order to increase public confidence in the use of human tissues and cells for application in the human body, it is essential, therefore, that EU provisions should ensure their quality and safety," the Commission proposal, published this summer, outlined.

It added: "Increased therapeutic use of substances of human origin and the recognition that they can transmit diseases have led to extensive discussion not only on the need for increased safety measures but also on the associated ethical issues."
To become law, the directive will require the approval of the European Parliament, which represents EU citizens directly, and the European Council of Ministers, which represents the governments of the 15 EU countries. Debate on the provisions of the proposed tissue directive will occur over the coming months.

Regulate every step

Under the proposal, formally entitled "Directive on Setting Standards of Quality and Safety for the Donation, Procurement, Testing, Processing, Storage and Distribution of Human Tissues and Cells", each EU country will be required to establish a national authority to oversee and regulate every step of the tissue donation process.

The tissue directive, which the Commission wrote after consulting with such groups as the European Eye Bank Association and European Association of Tissue Banks, would assign to each national authority the responsibility to inspect, supervise and even accredit tissue banks. Unaccredited tissue banks would be prohibited. Tissue banks will play a central role in co-ordinating donations from within and outside the EU according to the new directive.

In particular, it would appear from the wording of the proposed directive that ophthalmologists will be prohibited from importing eye tissue directly from outside the EU; instead, they will have to import the tissue through an accredited EU eye bank from a country whose tissue donation standards conform to those of the European Union.
Although the directive represents the most comprehensive tissue law of its kind, it will not affect human organs or tissues, or organs or cells of animal origin.
According to the European Commission, the transplantation of human organs "requires a different policy approach due to their specific nature and the severe shortages that result in many patients going untreated".

Regulatory problems
Also organs, tissues and cells of animal origin for human therapy "pose different regulatory problems that will need to be addressed in due course", according to the Commission.

The directive will also not affect the donation or transfusion of blood and blood products; they are already regulated under EU law.
Although the proposed tissue directive will apply to tissue transplants performed as part of a clinical trial, the directive will not affect "research using human tissues and cells when used for purposes other than application to the human body", including in vitro research and research involving animal models.

According to the Commission, the directive will also apply to germ cells, foetal cells and tissues and embryonic stem cells.
Although the use of such tissues poses particular ethical concerns in a number of EU countries, the actual use of such cells in transplantation will ultimately be determined by individual EU countries and not the EU as a whole.

In other words, if a country approves of the use of such cells and tissues, the provision of the directive will apply. If a country prohibits the use of such cells, the directive will not legalise their use.

Promote - not pay
The directive calls upon every EU country to "encourage voluntary and unpaid donations of tissues and cells with a view to ensuring they are in so far as possible provided from such donations".
Although the directive does not appear to prohibit the sale of human tissue, it does prohibit any advertising of such sale of tissue
"Advertising the need for, or availability of, human tissues and cells, with a view to offering or seeking financial gain or comparable advantage shall be prohibited," the directive reads.

In addition, it calls upon EU countries to undertake any necessary steps to "encourage that the procurement of tissues and cells is carried out on a non-profit basis".
The provisions of the tissue directive forbid the harvesting of tissue until the harvesting physicians comply with their own national laws in obtaining the consent of the relatives of the deceased.

In addition, the directive requires that tissue harvesters explain to the relatives of the deceased any results from tissue evaluation "when these results have relevance for their health or for public health".
The directive specifically prohibits cadaver donations in a number of situations where the cause of death is unknown or where there is a risk of the spread of infection or disease.

It also mandates a physical examination of the body before donation to exclude donors with vessel punctures, tattoos or body piercing.

Traceability required
Under the directive, EU countries will be required to ensure that "all tissues and cells procured, processed, stored and distributed on their territory can be traced from the donor to recipient and vice versa".

As part of the traceability programme, each donation and its products will receive a unique identification code which will be written on any packaging containing the tissue.

Also, the physicians who harvest the tissue will create a dossier to accompany each piece of tissue and product to its recipient.

In addition to the dossier for each piece of tissue, the directive will require tissue banks to maintain a detailed register of all donations it processes.

Donation excluded when cause of death is unknown

Under the tissue directive, donations will be excluded whenever a donor dies of an unknown cause or in circumstances that could place the tissue recipient at risk from disease or infection.

Such circumstances include:
When deceased ingested or was exposed to a toxic substance that may be transmitted in a toxic dose to the tissue recipients.
When the donor has died with most cancers. However, the directive makes a special exception for cornea donations: " with malignant diseases could be evaluated and considered for cornea donation, except those with retinoblastoma, melanoma of the anterior pole, haematological neoplasm, and malignant tumours that could affect the anterior pole of the eye."
When the donor may have contracted a prion-caused disease, including confirmed and suspected cases of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD), and non-variant CJD, the human form of bovine spongiform encephalopathy or so-called "mad cow disease".
When the donor had a history of rapid progressive dementia or degenerative neurological diseases of unknown origin.
When the donor had received pituitary gland-derived human growth hormones or dura matter.
When the donor died with an uncontrolled infection.
When the donor had a history, clinical evidence, or confirmed positive laboratory tests of HIV infection, acute or chronic hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection.
When the donor had a history of chronic haemodialysis.

Dossier for all tissue
Under the proposed human tissue directive any doctor who harvests tissue will be required to create a dossier to accompany the tissue.
The dossier will contain:
Donor identification
The consent form from the relatives of the deceased
Clinical data of donor
Date and starting and ending time of procurement of tissue
Laboratory test results
Autopsy results, if any
Also under the directive, such dossiers must be "legible and permanent and shall be in compliance with data protection legislation". In addition, the clinical records of the donor must be kept for at least 30 years.

Tissue banks will maintain tissue registers
Under the proposed human tissue directive, every tissue bank will be required to keep a register to which it will enter information about any tissue it has processed.
The register will record:
Details of the consent to the donation
Donor identification and characteristics: type of donor, age, sex, cause of death and presence of risk factors
Review of clinical data against donor selection criteria
Results of physical examination, laboratory tests and other tests (autopsy report where one was conducted)
Date and time of the death
Date and time of the procurement and health care establishment where the procurement is carried out
Conditions under which the cadaver is kept: refrigerated (or not), time of start of refrigeration and time of transfer to procurement site
Place of procurement, procurement team and person in charge of procurement
Degree of asepsis
Details of the preservation solutions used during procurement, including composition, lot, date of expiry, temperature, amount, concentration and preparation method
Grafts obtained and relevant characteristics
Relevant incidents that have occurred before, during, and after procurement
Destination of the cells/tissues procured
Method of preservation until arrival of tissues or cells at the bank

In the case of cellular cultures, it will also be necessary to document:
Characteristics of the lesion to be treated
Medicinal allergies of the recipient


If you have any suggestions for future Regulatory Matters columns, please contact Paul McGinn at +353 1 628 9747 or email paulrmcginn@eircom.net.

If you would like to read previous
"Regulatory Matters" columns, check out the archive.

Top