|

Wavefront-guided PRK causes less
increase in overall aberrations than conventional PRK in myopic
patients
Roibeard
O’hÉineacháin
in Rome
CUSTOMISED PRK using the Zyoptix (Bausch and Lomb) system appears
to increase higher order aberrations to a lesser degree than conventional
PRK in patients with myopic astigmatism, according to the results
of an Italian study presented at the 7th ESCRS Winter Refractive
Surgery Meeting.
The study compared 30 patients who underwent PRK with the customised
ablation system, with 30 patients undergoing conventional Planoscan
PRK. It showed that eyes which underwent Zyoptix ablation had a
significantly smaller increase in the root mean square (RMS) of
their higher order aberrations at six months follow-up, said Mario
Nubile MD.
“With standard Planoscan PRK there was an increase in all
aberrations. Coma, trefoil and spherical aberration increased and
the total RMS was nearly doubled. With Zyoptix PRK, the coma decreased
and there was less increase in trefoil and spherical aberration,
which were the main reasons there was less increase in the overall
RMS compared to Planoscan,” Dr Nubile said.
In the prospective study the two treatment groups both had myopic
astigmatism and a spherical equivalent ranging from -2.5 D to -6.0
D (mean: – 4.6 D). Both groups underwent PRK with the Technolas
217 excimer laser, one group with the wavefront-guided Zyoptix ablation
profile and the other with conventional Planoscan ablation.
“Six months postoperatively all eyes in both groups were within
1.0 D of emmetropia and 75% were within 0.5 D. There was no significant
difference between the two groups in terms of UCVA and BCVA and
both achieved excellent visual acuity. There was a non-significant
trend towards better visual acuity in the Zyoptix group,”
Dr Nubile said.
He added that several studies have shown that refractive photoablations
such as PRK and Lasik increases the overall corneal aberrations
and that the increase is dependent on pupil size and ablation depth.
The aberrations which increase most are spherical aberration and
coma. Proponents of PRK and Lasek note that these procedures do
not induce the flap-induced aberrations seen with Lasik.
The main cause for the reduction in optical quality in laser-based
refractive surgery is the modification of corneal asphericity. Other
factors include the bio-mechanical response, corneal mechanics and
the healing effect, he said.
“An ideal ablation should have different features. It should
improve optical quality, induce fewer aberrations and reduce existing
aberrations. It should also be aspheric and incorporate mechanical
and biological response. However, we are still far from this point,”
Dr Nubile said.
The superior results of wavefront-guided ablations may be partly
due to the lower amount of tissue that has to be removed - almost
13% less - compared to Planoscan ablations. By removing less tissue,
wavefront-guided ablation induces less of a healing response and
fewer bio-mechanical changes, he explained.
In support of this hypothesis, Dr Nubile pointed out that among
those in the Zyoptix group, the higher the preoperative higher order
RMS value, the lower was the percentage increase of aberrations.
Conversely, among those with low levels of preoperative higher order
aberration the percentage change was similar, whether they had undergone
Zyoptix or Planoscan ablation.
Dr Nubile suggested that in such eyes the healing response even
to customised ablation is still enough to negate any potential reduction
of higher order aberrations.
Thomas Kohnen MD, who chaired the session at the Rome meeting, noted
that he had observed the same trend in patients treated with wavefront-guided
Lasik.
“When we treated with customised Lasik we found that we sometimes
even increased the higher order aberrations in patients with low
amounts of higher order aberrations preoperatively, while we maintained
it among those we treated with high amounts of higher order aberrations,”
Dr Kohnen said.
Dr Kohnen said that this raised the question of whether patients
with only small amounts of higher order aberrations should undergo
customised ablations.
In response Dr Nubile pointed out that in his study patients with
low amounts of higher order aberrations undergoing Zyoptix ablations
did as well as similar patients undergoing Planoscan ablations.
Therefore, his results did not indicate that customised ablations
posed any hazard to such eyes. Furthermore, the majority of patients
have enough aberrations to potentially benefit from the wavefront-guided
approach, he said.
Leonardo
Mastropasqua MD
University G d'Annunzio, Chieti, Italy
Email: mastropa@unich.it
Top
|