ESCRS Homepage

May 2002
IN THIS ISSUE

Permavision inlays for hyperopia and myopia


LASEK, PRK and LASIK: Which is best?

LASIK experts on developments in microkeratomes

Third generation microkeratome technology swings pendulum in new direction

Close-up microkeratome blades reveal variation

Steps to smooth out folds and striae

MK-2000 at the cutting edge of blade technology for keratectomy procedures

What's new and old with microkeratomes?

Laser keratome may create better and safer flaps

Schwind and Amadeus microkeratomes yield similar results in comparison study

Simple test predicts cataract surgery outcome

Two-year results with Centerflex look promising

Treat post-op endophthalmitis early to keep sight

European Centerflex study presents six-month results

Considering getting into refractive surgery? Then come to Nice!

ESCRS/Alcon Video competition a Nice way to present

Study finds pupil size relatively small factor in predicting night time vision problems after LASIK

German ophthalmology is united through adversity

Pupillary light reflex alters corneal refraction

Accurate pupil measurements reduce post-LASIK halos

New keratoprosthesis integrates with eye

Good suture technique can minimise astigmatism in refractive corneal transplantation

Accurate pupil measurements reduce post-LASIK halos

Bulgarian ophthalmologist welcomes joining ECOSG

ISTA Pharmaceuticals attempts to salvage biotech drug for vitreal haemorrhage

Is there a risk of retinal detachment after YAG capsulotomy?

Handling the drama of the traumatic cataract patient

Alcon goes public but Nestle still calls the shots

FEATURES
From The Editor
Society Matters
Miscellan-Eye
Digital Opthalmologist
Healthcare in Europe
Bio-ophthalmology
Outlook on Industry
In Your Good Books
Reflections on Refractive Surgery
Regulatory Matters



Simple test predicts cataract surgery outcome

By Roibeard O'hEineachain

BRUSSELS - A simple preoperative macular function test can provide surgeons with an accurate prediction of a cataract patient's visual outcome after surgery, according to Jérôme C Vryghem MD.

The test involves having the patients read a Parinaud chart at a distance of about 12 cm with a hyper-addition lens of +8 D over and above their long distance correction. The distance at which the text is held is critical and patients must adjust this distance for themselves. A Heine bonoscope was used to closely illuminate the lines on the near card. The chart includes only numbers with either the Parinaud 1 or LEA Optotype 10/10, explained Dr Vryghem, Clinique St-Jean, Brussels.

"This macular function test is easy to perform. It requires only limited material and has a score that is easy to record. It also has a high positive predictive value. In cases of senile macular changes, it allows the surgeon to take a correct decision whether to operate or not," he said.

Retrospective trial
Dr Vryghem and his associates Dr H Van Cleynenbreugel and Dr K Leroux conducted a retrospective study of 400 uncomplicated consecutive cataract procedures performed by a single surgeon from September 2000 to February 2001. The patients included 130 men and 270 women with a mean age of 77 years. The mean preoperative BCVA was 20/50. None of the patients had previous eye surgery or trauma and none had any known paracentral scotoma or corneal oedema.

Overall, 363 eyes (90.7%) could read Parinaud I in the preoperative test. Among these eyes, final BCVA was better than or equal to 20/25 in 338 (93.1%) and better than or equal to 20/30 in 365 (98.1%). Among 37 eyes that were not able to read Parinaud 1 preoperatively and yet attained 20/25 or better postoperatively, 25 presented with dense nuclear or subcapsular cataract. Among seven eyes that were able to read Parinaud 1 preoperatively but did not achieve a BCVA 20/30 or better postoperatively, four were known to be amblyopic.

The results of this study suggest that this simple macular function test has a positive predictive value of 93.1 % to predict a visual outcome of equal to or better than 20/25 after uncomplicated cataract surgery with a sensitivity of 93.1 % and a specificity of 32.4 %.

The negative predictive value is 32.4 %. If a BCVA of 20/30 or better is considered, the positive predictive value is 98.1%. If amblyopic eyes are excluded from the total group, the positive predictive value of the test is even better (99.2% reached a postoperative BCVA equal or better than 20/30). In patients with dense cataracts, where Parinaud 1 cannot be read, it has no predictive value. In patients with amblyopia where Parinaud 1 can be read, it is too optimistic.

Dr Vryghem presented his findings at the XIX Congress of the ESCRS.

Top