|

A
personal look back at microkeratom technology
Roles
and designs of microkeratomes continue to evolve as laser ablation
and corneal lamellar procedures improve.
The very limited role of microkeratomes for almost two decades was
followed by widespread use over the last half decade as their predictability
and safety increased - now their roles are changing again.
All refractive procedures that were performed two decades ago modified
optical properties by only indirectly altering corneal power and
curvature. Microkeratomes were introduced at that time to improve
two of those procedures, keratomileusis and keratophakia.
First Barraquer Microkeratomes
Although those procedures were ingenious and their development by
the Jose Barraquer in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s underscored his
creativity and insight as far as the potential of corneal refractive
surgery, they did not gain large clinical acceptance because of
the complexities of the techniques and problems related to safety
and efficacy. The use of the microkeratome rather than free hand
dissection with a knife improved removal of the corneal disc, but
significant technical problems persisted.
Although those procedures could reduce spherical errors, the cutting,
freezing and suturing of the disc caused loss of visual acuity,
wound healing abnormalities and irregular corneas. Barraquer's work
taught us, nonetheless, a great deal about optical, physiological
and anatomical responses of the cornea to refractive surgery.
Contrary to the prevailing opinions and research directions of the
few keratorefractive surgeons in 1980, I did not believe that those
non direct procedures using cryolathes and microkeratomes for altering
corneal contour were the right approach and therefore conceived
my direct far ultraviolet laser approach. While I pursued my experimental
and analytical work on laser wide area surface ablation, that for
several years in the early 1980s no one else believed to be feasible,
keratorefractive surgeons were still trying to make mechanical keratomileusis
successful.
By the mid 1980s, the cryolathe had been abandoned in favour of
two microkeratome cuts to avoid damaging effects of freezing stromal
tissue.
Unfortunately, just as with the cryolathe technique, that I also
had found intellectually interesting, because of their technical
complexity but that I believed would not gain widespread acceptance,
the BKS dual cut microkeratome system was also abandoned.
The proponents of mechanical keratomileusis nonetheless continued
to focus their attention on improving the reliability and accuracy
of the microkeratome. By that time, commercial exploitation of far-ultraviolet
laser surface ablation had already occurred.
Combining Excimer And Microkeratome
At the time of the first blind eye excimer studies in 1987 and 1988,
I was asked by one of the investigators for solutions to the problem
of fine fibrillar haze and remodelling of corneal tissue relating
to the activity of the keratocytes that might cause the procedure
to be less effective than its ultimate capabilities. I suggested
details of more refined delivery systems to create smoother ablations,
which I believed to be the better approach for reducing aggressive
wound healing response. I also disclosed to him another approach
- the combination of combining ablation of the exposed corneal surface
with the Barraquer variant of keratomileusis is which the lenticule
is not completely severed. Although attachment and alignment problems
could be partially alleviated by the incomplete severing, I felt
that the irregular cuts produced by available microkeratomes made
that approach less desirable at that time. In fact, it wasn't until
a decade later that the safety of combining a microkeratome with
excimer laser ablation achieved levels comparable to that of PRK.
Microkeratomes continued to evolve during the late 1980s and early
1990s while keratomileusis in situ and ALK were tried in further
attempts to improve mechanical keratomileusis. Automated geared
microkeratomes with improved suction rings were developed.
It was only after Ioannis Pallikaris, MD and Lucio Buratto MD ablated
the stromal bed and posterior aspect of caps and flaps with the
excimer laser after performing microkeratome cuts that mechanical
keratomileusis was finally abandoned.
Increased Predictability And Safety
Fortunately, improvements in the late 1990s in mechanical microkeratome
design increased the predictability of flap diameter and thickness,
hinge size and edge characteristics and decreased flap complications
such as incomplete or button holed flaps, free caps and epithelial
defects. Those improvements provided safety and results that I could
accept for my patients and finally enabled microkeratomes and LASIK
to gain widespread acceptance.
Manual microkeratome designs first offered surgeons the ability
to vary microkeratome parameters based on corneal diameter and curvature
to decrease complications but required a certain degree of ambidexterity
to achieve consistent flaps. The LASIK learning curve has shortened
as a result of newer automated machines.
Blade quality is still an issue and not consistent from manufacturer
to manufacturer. Metallic and other foreign body particles from
blades are known causes of diffuse lamellar keratitis.
It still remains to be demonstrated whether laser and water-jet
microkeratomes will be more convenient, safe and predictable than
the latest generation mechanical microkeratomes. Will they offer
advantages for wavefront guided ablations? Wavefront technology
has been providing additional information regarding the optical
effects of microkeratome cuts and creating another PRK versus LASIK
controversy. It will be interesting to see the future of microkeratomes.
If
you would like to read previous "Reflections on Refractive
Surgery", check
out the archive.
Top |