ESCRS Homepage

May 2002
IN THIS ISSUE

Permavision inlays for hyperopia and myopia


LASEK, PRK and LASIK: Which is best?

LASIK experts on developments in microkeratomes

Third generation microkeratome technology swings pendulum in new direction

Close-up microkeratome blades reveal variation

Steps to smooth out folds and striae

MK-2000 at the cutting edge of blade technology for keratectomy procedures

What's new and old with microkeratomes?

Laser keratome may create better and safer flaps

Schwind and Amadeus microkeratomes yield similar results in comparison study

Simple test predicts cataract surgery outcome

Two-year results with Centerflex look promising

Treat post-op endophthalmitis early to keep sight

European Centerflex study presents six-month results

Considering getting into refractive surgery? Then come to Nice!

ESCRS/Alcon Video competition a Nice way to present

Study finds pupil size relatively small factor in predicting night time vision problems after LASIK

German ophthalmology is united through adversity

Pupillary light reflex alters corneal refraction

Accurate pupil measurements reduce post-LASIK halos

New keratoprosthesis integrates with eye

Good suture technique can minimise astigmatism in refractive corneal transplantation

Accurate pupil measurements reduce post-LASIK halos

Bulgarian ophthalmologist welcomes joining ECOSG

ISTA Pharmaceuticals attempts to salvage biotech drug for vitreal haemorrhage

Is there a risk of retinal detachment after YAG capsulotomy?

Handling the drama of the traumatic cataract patient

Alcon goes public but Nestle still calls the shots

FEATURES
From The Editor
Society Matters
Miscellan-Eye
Digital Opthalmologist
Healthcare in Europe
Bio-ophthalmology
Outlook on Industry
In Your Good Books
Reflections on Refractive Surgery
Regulatory Matters



LASEK, PRK and LASIK: Which is best?
ESCRS Symposium in Nice will try to dispel confusion surrounding the best technique

By Roibeard O'hEineachain

A symposium at this year's ESCRS conference in Nice may help dispel the confusion surrounding the relative merits of LASIK, PRK and LASEK, according to session Chairman and Organiser Prof Dan Epstein.

"There is an acute controversy about which one of the three different methods will provide the best results. The advent of wavefront-guided ablation systems has added to the confusion and it is our hope that this symposium will provide some clarity on the issue," Prof Epstein said in an interview with EuroTimes.

The symposium, entitled "LASIK vs PRK vs LASEK," will include three clinical presentations on each of the techniques and three presentations of basic science. Three experienced surgeons will each explain the advantages of one of the procedures while the basic science portion of the session will include discussions on what actually happens to the eye after each of the procedures in terms of optics, cellular morphology and corneal biomechanics.

In the first half of the session Michael Knorz MD (Germany) will discuss whether LASIK deserves the immense popularity it has attained. Niels Ehlers MD (Denmark) will explain why many surgeons continue to perform PRK. And finally, Daniel Durrie MD (USA) will question whether LASEK is just a 'flash in the pan' technique for today's ophthalmologist.

Each of the surgeons will present their own results with the techniques as well as data from the latest peer reviewed papers. In the second half of the symposium, Ray Applegate PhD (USA) will analyse the difference between the three techniques in terms of wavefront aberrations. He will discuss whether there are more aberrations after LASIK, PRK or LASEK and which of the techniques is likely to work best with the new wavefront-guided systems.

In addition, Jorge Alio MD (Spain) will present his research on the cellular and morphological changes in the cornea induced by the three techniques as viewed through confocal microscopy. Cynthia Roberts PhD (USA) will describe the effect each of the three techniques has on the biomechanics of the cornea. She will present her latest research into which of the three techniques gives the most predictable results in terms of corneal curvature and topography.

"This symposium will address one of the major concerns in refractive surgery. The average refractive surgeon doesn't have enough access to the latest research and technology to make an informed decision. "We are trying to clear up some of the clouds. We are not going to present definitive answers but we will give the surgeons the information supply available so they can make up their own minds," Prof Epstein added.

Top