ESCRS Homepage

May 2002
IN THIS ISSUE

Permavision inlays for hyperopia and myopia


LASEK, PRK and LASIK: Which is best?

LASIK experts on developments in microkeratomes

Third generation microkeratome technology swings pendulum in new direction

Close-up microkeratome blades reveal variation

Steps to smooth out folds and striae

MK-2000 at the cutting edge of blade technology for keratectomy procedures

What's new and old with microkeratomes?

Laser keratome may create better and safer flaps

Schwind and Amadeus microkeratomes yield similar results in comparison study

Simple test predicts cataract surgery outcome

Two-year results with Centerflex look promising

Treat post-op endophthalmitis early to keep sight

European Centerflex study presents six-month results

Considering getting into refractive surgery? Then come to Nice!

ESCRS/Alcon Video competition a Nice way to present

Study finds pupil size relatively small factor in predicting night time vision problems after LASIK

German ophthalmology is united through adversity

Pupillary light reflex alters corneal refraction

Accurate pupil measurements reduce post-LASIK halos

New keratoprosthesis integrates with eye

Good suture technique can minimise astigmatism in refractive corneal transplantation

Accurate pupil measurements reduce post-LASIK halos

Bulgarian ophthalmologist welcomes joining ECOSG

ISTA Pharmaceuticals attempts to salvage biotech drug for vitreal haemorrhage

Is there a risk of retinal detachment after YAG capsulotomy?

Handling the drama of the traumatic cataract patient

Alcon goes public but Nestle still calls the shots

FEATURES
From The Editor
Society Matters
Miscellan-Eye
Digital Opthalmologist
Healthcare in Europe
Bio-ophthalmology
Outlook on Industry
In Your Good Books
Reflections on Refractive Surgery
Regulatory Matters



ISTA Pharmaceuticals attempts to salvage biotech drug for vitreal haemorrhage

By Gearóid Tuohy PhD

Officials at an American bio-pharmaceutical company are attempting to salvage a drug for vitreal haemorrhage that has failed clinical trials.
As part of the salvage operation, officials at California-based ISTA Pharmaceuticals were to meet with the officials at the US Food and Drug Administration to determine the fate of Vitrase.

Those meetings followed the late March announcement that results from two Phase III studies failed to show any statistical improvement in patients using the enzyme-based therapy.

The studies also showed that Vitrase was associated with adverse reactions which included iritis, hyperemia and ocular pain in some patients.

The poor clinical results represented a severe economic blow to ISTA. According to the Tufts Centre for the Study of Drug Development, it costs an average of $802 million to bring a new drug to the market.

The market for vitreal hemorrhage treatment is very large. Each year hundreds of thousands of people in the developed world temporarily lose their sight after a vitreal haemorrhage leaks into the retina and clouds their vision.

Almost 65% of all reported cases of vitreal haemorrhage arise from proliferative diabetic retinopathy. To date, the only choices for treating vitreal haemorrhage have been to operate or to simply wait up to 18 months for the clouding to clear.

The FDA had designated Vitrase for a "fast track" approval process. Such fast track approvals are reserved for "new drugs intended for the treatment of serious or life threatening conditions with potential to address unmet clinical need."

Top