|

Handling the drama of the traumatic cataract patient
by
Maxine Lipner
It's classic high drama - a patient has been struck in the eye and
now has a traumatic cataract. Here are some insights on how to proceed.
When dealing with a traditional cataract, there is plenty of time
for a practitioner to plan the next move and determine how to handle
the situation. But, what about the patient with an acute injury
to the lens? Unfortunately, practitioners must decide on the spot
whether to proceed and how to maximize visual outcome.
"The incidence of traumatic cataract with penetrating injury
is significant," said M. Bowes Hamill, MD, PhD, associate professor
of ophthalmology at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston. "This
is a management problem that we have to address every time we are
faced with a patient with a penetrating globe injury," he said.
The practitioner faces a series of choices. First comes the question
of whether to repair the cataract simultaneously with primary repair
or to do a secondary repair. Second, if the repair is done simultaneously,
the practitioner must decide whether to implant an intraocular lens
at that time, Hamill said.
Taking a traumatic pause
"Just because there is a cataract, doesn't mean that it has
to come out - at least not right then," Hamill said. He finds
that isolated anterior capsular breaks, especially if they are not
in the visual axis, can heal quite nicely without surgical intervention.
Likewise, concussive cataracts will also heal with time, especially
if they are off-axis subanterior capsular cataracts.
There are only a couple of occasions when cataract surgery is ever
an emergency, Hamill said. "One is lens dislocation causing
pupillary block glaucoma and the other is an intumescent lens causing
angle-closure glaucoma," he said. In both cases, the lens is
removed, but not because of the cataract - it is removed to treat
the secondary glaucoma.
Determining whether to do a primary or a secondary procedure is
a matter of weighing the advantages and disadvantages. There are
several advantages to primary cataract extraction, which can be
done as one procedure along with the trauma repair. "There
is a lot less anesthetic risk, and there is early visual rehabilitation
that may be important with pediatrics," Hamill said. In addition,
patients with problems returning for follow-up may appreciate the
one-step procedure, he said.
"Another advantage is that we can get that opaque lens material
out of the way," Hamill said. "That allows us to really
get a good look at the posterior pole by direct visualization, which,
by any measure, is certainly better than an indirect measure."
One final advantage to a primary extraction is the large pupil access.
"If you are going to do an iris repair at the same time, especially
if you do a pupilloplasty, you may not be able to get a big pupil
again, so cataract surgery may be difficult," Hamill said.
There are also numerous disadvantages to primary removal, however.
One is the ability at the initial evaluation to always determine
whether a cataract is visually significant.
"We may see a lens opacity and think it's significant, but
is it really going to cause loss of vision?" Hamill asked.
Also, a primary cataract extraction is harder to do at the time
of the primary repair than would be a secondary procedure. Practitioners
also don't know the status of the zonules and may not be able to
see through the corneal pathology to get all the cortical remnants
out or to do the procedure as well as they'd like, Hamill said.
The ophthalmologist must then decide what to do about the IOL. Positioning
the lens in the bag is clearly preferable, especially in younger
patients who are at particular risk for injury, Hamill said. "You
don't want to put angle-supported lenses in young patients; they
just don't do well, both for glaucoma risk and for secondary scarring,"
he said. "I think that there are also some concerns with putting
ciliary sulcus lens implants into younger kids, especially if we
have an option."
There can, however, be hurdles to overcome. The practitioner frequently
doesn't know the status of the zone at the time of the initial closure.
There's also the potential of harboring bacteria on an implant as
it is slipped through a possibly infected wound, Hamill said. In
addition, there's the practical problem of IOL power calculation.
"If you look at your patient and you think … an IOL [is
needed], go ahead and do IOL calculations, but do it on the fellow
eye, which is generally pretty close," Hamill said.
The surgical stage
To handle a traumatic cataract repair, the practitioner needs to
include an assortment of special techniques. In doing a capsulotomy,
it's critical to make sure that the practitioner can see the capsule,
said Michael E. Snyder, MD, of the Cincinnati Eye Institute. "Typically,
these cataracts may be white in many instances, and ICG [indocyanine
green] or trypan blue can be extraordinarily helpful …,"
he said. This is, however, an off-label use of ICG and trypan blue;
unfortunately trypan blue is not Food and Drug Administration-approved
or available in the United States.
Any anterior capsular tears should be encompassed within the capsulorrhexis,
Snyder said. How- ever, this is rarely possible. "The capsulorrhexis
ideally should be complete and the desired size would be approximately
1 mm to 1.5 mm smaller than the desired IOL optic," Snyder
said. "An intact capsulorrhexis is also mandatory for a capsular
tension ring placement."
After the capsulorrhexis is complete, in cases of zonular dialysis,
capsular retractors can aid in visualization of the lens and in
its removal. Lens removal can be routine in cases where the posterior
capsule is intact, however, not so when there's a tear. "When
the capsule is compromised, vitreous could be admixed with the lens
material," Snyder said.
The vitreous cutter should always be used whenever lens material
is present within the vitreous material. Snyder recommends a pars
plana approach. He finds that a viscotamponade can be very helpful
in preventing vitreous prolapse when the hyaloid face is still intact
but exposed to the anterior segment. "One should always start
injecting the viscoelastic material over the area of exposed hyaloid
face and then move the cannula distally as the chamber becomes more
pressurized," Snyder said. When pulling the vitreous out of
the anterior chamber, a pars plana approach is also ideal, Snyder
said. "Trying to pull vitreous forward from a limbal incision
is much less successful," he said.
Younger traumatic cataract patients may require special attention
in lens removal. "The lens material may be very soft and may
be aspirated in a dry fashion." In such cases, the anterior
chamber can be filled with viscoelastic and the lens manually aspirated
through a cannula.
In any traumatic cataract case, it may be necessary to deal with
capsular plaques. These may occasionally need to be dissected from
the capsular bag and can sometimes be very thick. Such plaques can
be removed with both blunt dissection and viscodissection. "Once
it's dissected, you can gently peel the plaque out," Snyder
said.
However, occasionally these plaques can be attached to the posterior
capsule by a stalk. "They can be lysed with a scissors,"
he said. "Then the entire plaque can be removed, leaving a
clear posterior capsule and an intact bag."
When it comes to selecting the proper IOL for these patients, PMMA
or acrylic are ideal, Snyder said. "I strongly discourage collamer
or hydrogel implant," he said. "Also, no plate-haptic
IOLs, silicone IOLs, or anterior chamber implants in these traumatic
cases."
The implant should be placed within the bag, within the sulcus and
sutured, or some combination of the two, he said.
"Traumatic cataracts truly are a mixed breed," Snyder
said. "Successful surgery requires a wide variety of techniques
and they must be suited to the particular occasion and particular
case."
Top
|