|

European Centerflex study presents six-month results
By
Ana Hidalgo-Simon
 |
| Gerd
Auffarth ,MD |
SUSSEX,
UK - Excellent fixation and centration: these are the two main findings
of the initial six months of the German Centerflex study.
The German study, part of a larger European study, has recruited
84 patients (54 women and 30 men) so far. The mean age of participants
was 73, but the range is wide (30 to 86 years).
Gerd Auffarth MD, University of Heidelberg reviewed the preliminary
data from these patients, with follow-up ranging from two to 12
months.
Patients received Centerflex IOLs of between 14 D and 30 D. Preoperative
visual acuity varied between 0.05 D to 0.8 D. The mean endothelial
cell count was 2614 (+/- 384).
Visual acquity
All patients studied achieved visual acuities of better than 0.5
D (or 20/40) at 6 months and development of distance visual acuity
was progressive.
From an average of less than 0.4 D preoperatively, the mean stabilised
around 0.8 D between three and six months. For the 34 patients for
whom one year follow-up is available, distance visual acuity was
maintained at the level achieved by the six-month period. All patients
achieved a corrected distance acuity of 20/40 or better after six
months.
The corneal endothelial cell count did not change significantly
over the study period: values oscillated close to the baseline levels
over measurements at one day, two months and six months postoperatively.
Dr Auffarth noted that on top of the usual FDA safety and efficacy
examinations, the investigators looked very carefully at centration,
IOL rotation and PCO development. These were the areas in which
it was felt the new lens provides the most benefit over existing
implants.
The researchers measured the area of overlap between the capsulorrhexis
and the entire optic in order to assess the stability of the lens.
They used a custom computer-based system of immunoanalysis. The
results showed a very stable anterior capsule over the lens, he
said.
The same program was used to measure rotation of the lens within
the capsule. The computer takes a reference point, for example a
haptic, and then monitors the position of the lens at several time
points. The rotation changes of the lens detected were very small,
under 3o over a period of six months. Only one patient had a significant
rotation of 30o in the first week.
"We used a similar system to measure centration. The displacement
of the centre of the optic was followed over time. We found very
little movement: the maximum was 0.85 mm (found at one month post-operatively),
and the average over six months was 0.5 mm. The biggest changes
both in centration and rotation were observed within the first four
weeks," Dr Auffarth explained.
EPCO for evaluation of PCO
He and his colleagues used a computer system called EPCO for evaluation
of posterior capsule opacification (PCO). The system calculates
a PCO index for each lens studied. The computer first measures the
area of the lens affected by opacification. It then assesses the
degree of opacification according to a gradient and uses the two
elements to calculate the PCO index at several observation points.
That PCO score can be compared over time and between different lenses.
"It is very early days to make accurate assessments of PCO
with Centerflex, but we have done some initial comparisons with
a large database of PCO in different lenses in our centre.
"I can say that, so far, Centerflex is scoring at six months
at the same level that rounded edged silicone and Acrysof lenses
do at 12 or 14 months," Dr Auffarth observed.
He added that his experience with Centerflex so far had been very
positive, citing such advantages as easy and safe implantation,
excellent centration and fixation and very little rotation. Furthermore,
its biocompatibility is good and the refractive power is reliable.
In the long-term, however, he said PCO could prove problematic.
Dr Auffarth presented his findings at a symposium sponsored by Rayner
held in Buxted Park, Surrey, UK.
Top
|