ESCRS Homepage

June 2003
IN THIS ISSUE

Corneal pachymetry proves key to glaucoma diagnosis


Probing physiology behind accommodative lens implants

Intralase cuts enhancement rates by 30% after LASIK

‘Quality of vision’ in sharp focus as four Main Symposia frame XXI ESCRS Congress

Allegretto laser works well for both hyperopia
and myopia correction, says FDA trial data

Innovative impulse device enables tongue to ‘see’ by processing sensory data to the brain

Increased precision of eye tracking module vital for customised ablations of large corneal areas

New adaptive optics system reduces higher order aberrations and previews custom ablation outcomes

High-resolution WASCA system shows good refractive outcomes for customised ablation

Results of prevalence studies casts link between ocular pressure and glaucoma in new light

New phakic IOL ‘gives good refractive outcome and is very well tolerated’, says specialist

Myopes are more likely to develop vitreoretinal complications than hyperopes after lens exchange

Preoperative myopia proves a good outcome predictor for LASIK surgery

Broad beam laser with Gaussian delivery obviates need for eye tracker in LASEK procedures

Modified approach needed for IOL power readings in post-RK eyes to cut risk of hyperopic outcome

Block excision therapy of choice for epithelial in-growth

CLAPIKS offers novel pharmacological approach for treatment the hyperopia after LASIK surgey

Study shows LASIK could provide long-term savings to patients despite initial costs

Theories take shape to unravel mystery of presbyopia development in the human eye

Retinal detachment risk in high myopes unaltered by excimer laser vision correction procedure

Ocular surgery patients advised to avoid risk of infection by staying away from swimming pools

Personalised iris prosthesis comes a shade closer to the ideal coloured iris solution

FEATURES
From The Editor
Guest Editorial
Reflections on Refractive Surgery
Bio-Ophthalmology
In Your Good Books
Bio-ophthalmology
Digital Opthalmologist
Regulatory Matters


Preoperative myopia proves a good outcome predictor for LASIK surgery

Barbara Boughton in San Francisco, US

PREOPERATIVE myopia is more predictive of a superior outcome following LASIK than preoperative K value, reported Canadian researchers at the annual ASCRS Symposium on Cataract, IOL and Refractive Surgery.

Investigators at Montreal’s McGill University measured the two-year postoperative vision quality of 51 eyes which had undergone myopic LASIK procedures (Bausch & Lomb 217c).

They divided the patients into four groups based on their preoperative myopia and K values. The four groups were: patients with high K values (44 or above) and lower myopia (less than -5.0 D); high K values and higher myopia (at least -5.0 D); lower K (less than 44) and lower myopia; and lower K and higher myopia.

All patients in the study achieved 20/20 vision after their LASIK surgeries as measured by Snellen acuity testing. But there were clear differences among patients in terms of their contrast sensitivity scores as measured by their ability to distinguish different size sine-wave gratings, reported Leon Solomon MD.

"Our study indicates that a patient who walks into the office at -8.0 D has a lesser chance of getting normal contrast sensitivity after LASIK than those who walk in at -3.0 D," Dr Solomon said.

Patients with higher K values and lower myopia achieved the best contrast sensitivity scores - 93% of patients had contrast sensitivity equivalent to 20/20 or better. A total of 75% of those with lower K and lower myopia attained contrast sensitivity equivalent or better than 20/20.

But the two groups with higher myopia had the worst outcomes. Only 28% to 36% of those patients achieved contrast sensitivity equivalent to 20/20 or better. However, a majority of these patients - about 65% to 70% - achieved 20/30 vision.
"These are issues ophthalmologists should be aware of in order to counsel their patients," Dr Solomon said.

"If a patient comes in at -8.0 D or -9.0 D and asks for LASIK, you should probably tell them they will have to sacrifice a little contrast sensitivity. But they will probably not suffer much. The will just lose a little contrast sensitivity - they will not see as well in dull light."
None of the patients in Dr Solomon’s study have complained of contrast sensitivity problems, he added.

Dr Solomon stressed that preoperative K values had no predictive value for superior visual outcomes. Some 61% of those with higher K had contrast sensitivity equivalent to 20/20 or better, compared with 57% of those with lower K.
"Preoperative K didn’t make a difference in visual function after LASIK. Rather it was the degree of myopia that was important," he said.

"This is exactly what our findings have been using the Allegretto laser. Degree of myopia is the important predictive value for visual function after LASIK," agreed researcher Guy M Kezirian MD, US.

Contrast sensitivity testing has come to the fore recently as a measure of quality of vision. The Snellen visual acuity test is valuable for obtaining refractive values, but doesn’t reliably measure contrast or quality of vision. Contrast sensitivity results tend to correlate better with patient satisfaction after LASIK, Dr Solomon emphasised.
In fact, in his own study, all patients achieved BCVA of 20/20 or better using Snellen, but only 59% had contrast sensitivity scores equivalent to 20/20 or better.

"Different values in sine wave gratings show us the patient’s abilities in daily vision tasks. Thus, contrast sensitivity is a simple method of determining visual function. It is an under-utilised test, but it is simple and can be done in your office in two minutes," Dr Solomon said.

The sine wave grating evaluation uses a repeated number of blurry dark and white cycles, with the amount of cycles of a grating over a specified visual angle being equal to a spatial frequency.

The higher the spatial frequency, the smaller the image size expressed in cycles per degree. The patient’s ability to distinguish different size sine wave gratings is indicative of better quality vision - the capability to distinguish objects of different sizes and at different levels of contrast, he explained.

Leon Solomon MD
McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Email: Jeanne_young41@hotmail.com

Top