Lisbon 2017 Delegate Registration Programme Exhibition Virtual Exhibition Satellites OneWorld Travel Discount
escrs app advert

Biomechanical analysis of different retreatment options after SMILE refractive surgery

Search Title by author or title

Session Details

Session Title: Corneal Biomechanics

Session Date/Time: Monday 09/10/2017 | 08:00-10:30

Paper Time: 09:08

Venue: Room 2.1

First Author: : B.Spiru GERMANY

Co Author(s): :    S. Kling   F. Hafezi   W. Sekundo              

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To determine the corneal weakening induced by different re-treatment options after SmILE, and to investigate the potential of corneal cross-linking (CXL) to re-establish the original corneal stress resistance.

Setting:

Sabine Kling*1, Bogdan Spiru*2, Farhad Hafezi 3,4, Walter Sekundo 2 1 Laboratory of Ocular Cell Biology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany 3 ELZA Institute, Dietikon/Zurich, Switzerland 4 University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Methods:

96 freshly enucleated porcine corneas were used. The initial refractive correction was defined to be -11D, the required enhancement to be -3D. Three different retreatment options were analyzed: (i) Re-SmILE, (ii) PRK on top of the SmILE cap and (iii) cap-to-flap conversion and excimer ablation on the stromal bed (“LASIK”). The (iv) control condition did not receive any treatment. Subsequently, accelerated CXL (9mW/cm2, 10min) was performed in two groups with currently common enhancement techniques: (v) following cap-to-flap conversion (“LASIK” enhancement) and (vi) in controls. Biomechanical properties were measured with stress-strain extensometry in the range from 1.27 to 12.5N.

Results:

The Re-SmILE and PRK enhancement did not significantly reduce the overall elastic modulus of the cornea compared to controls (24.7+/-2.23 MPa and 22.7+/-2.61 MPa versus 23.8+/-3.35 MPa, p>/=0.176), while LASIK enhancement did (22.2+/-3.37 MPa, p=0.048). CXL treatment significantly increased the elastic modulus compared to all non-cross-linked conditions (p

Conclusions:

In enhancement, the corneal biomechanical integrity is less affected with both, Re-SMILE and PRK enhancement. Corneal weakening through laser refractive surgery is small compared to the stiffening effect after CXL.

Financial Disclosure:

receives consulting fees, retainer, or contract payments from a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented

Back to previous