Lisbon 2017 Delegate Registration Programme Exhibition Virtual Exhibition Satellites OneWorld Travel Discount
escrs app advert

Safety and efficacy of femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)to correct astigmatism

Search Title by author or title

Session Details

Session Title: Small Lenticule Extraction

Session Date/Time: Sunday 08/10/2017 | 11:00-12:30

Paper Time: 11:51

Venue: Room 3.6

First Author: : S.Tolees SAUDI ARABIA

Co Author(s): :    A. Eldanasoury                    

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To evaluate and compare refractive outcomes of astigmatism correction after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (WFG LASIK) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Setting:

Magrabi Eye Hospital - Jeddah

Methods:

This comparative study enrolled a total of 89 eyes that had undergone SMILE (43 eyes) and wavefront-guided LASIK (46 eyes). Preoperative astigmatism cylindrical diopters were in range from -1.00 to -5.00 diopters [D]). Study parameters included UDVA, CDVA, refractive cylinder and astigmatism correction index (ACI) the ratio of SIA to TIA. All subjects completed the 6-month follow-up.

Results:

No significant differences were found in the target-induced astigmatism between SMILE and WFG LASIK. At the 6-month, the mean spherical diopters in WFG LASIK and SMILE were 0.17 D ± 0.37 D° and 0.16 D ± 0.45 D°, respectively. Mean cylindrical in WFG LASIK and SMILE were -0.38 D ± 0.32 D° and -0.47 D ± 0.35 D°, respectively. Angle of error within ± 5 degrees was achieved in 75% of WFG LASIK and in 65% of SMILE. Mean astigmatic correction index was 0.86±0.18 and 0.85±0.21 in WFG and SMILE respectively.96% of eyes had UDVA of 20/40 in both groups

Conclusions:

Both procedures showed preferable outcomes in the correction of moderate and high astigmatism. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) was safe, effective, and predictable.

Financial Disclosure:

NONE

Back to previous