Copenhagen 2016 Registration Programme Exhibitor Information Virtual Exhibition Satellite Meetings Glaucoma Day 2016 Hotel Star Alliance
title

10 - 14 Sept. 2016, Bella Center, Copenhagen, Denmark

This Meeting has been awarded 27 CME credits

 

escrs app advert yo advert

Posters

Search Title by author or title

Outcomes of modified mushroom femtosecond laser deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty

Poster Details

First Author: M.Espinosa UNITED KINGDOM

Co Author(s):    S. Daya                    

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To evaluate the visual, refractive and keratometric outcomes of patients undergoing femtosecond laser deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (FSDALK) using a modified mushroom geometric pattern.

Setting:

Centre for Sight, London, East Grinstead and Oxshott, UK :Private ambulatory Surgical Centre

Methods:

Retrospective evaluation of 77 eyes of 68 patients who underwent FSDALK. Measures included uncorrected (UDVA) and best corrected visual acuity (CDVA), keratometric and refractive astigmatism, spherical equivalent (CE) and any adverse events.

Results:

52 recipients were male and 25 female. Indications included keratoconus (n=68) and scarring(n=4), Post Lasik ectasia(n=2) corneal dystrophy (n=2). Trephination was performed with the Intralase iFS femtosecond laser and lamellar dissection performed manually (Big bubble attempted in 52, accomplished in 29 and remainder modified Melles). Mean UDVA LogMAR was 0.70 at 3M, 0.68 at 6 months and 0.66 at 12M postop. Mean CDVA LogMAR was 0.40 at 3M, 0.39 at 6M and 0.35 (20/30) at 1 year. At 1Y 61.9% had CDVA of 20/40 or better. Mean keratometric cylinder at 6 months was 4.61D (SD 2.57) and refractive cylinder 4.13D (SD 2.14). Mean SE at 6M was +0.89D (SD 4.14). Mean time for suture removal was 14.2 Months (SD 6.08).

Conclusions:

FSDALK with an anteriorly undermined modified mushroom technique combined with manual posterior lamellar dissection is a safe and promising technique which results in good visual rehabilitation

Financial Disclosure:

One or more of the authors research is funded, fully or partially, by a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented

Back to Poster listing