Copenhagen 2016 Registration Programme Exhibitor Information Virtual Exhibition Satellite Meetings Glaucoma Day 2016 Hotel Star Alliance
title

10 - 14 Sept. 2016, Bella Center, Copenhagen, Denmark

This Meeting has been awarded 27 CME credits

 

escrs app advert yo advert

Comparison of the biomechanical effect of low and higher myopic SMILE compared to stand-alone LASIK, and to LASIK concurrent with corneal cross-linking (LASIK+CXL)

Search Title by author or title

Session Details

Session Title: Presented Poster Session: Corneal Biomechanics

Session Date/Time: Saturday 10/09/2016 | 15:00-16:30

Paper Time: 15:10

Venue: Poster Village: Pod 4

First Author: : G.Pamel GREECE

Co Author(s): :    A. Kanellopoulos              

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To evaluate the effects on corneal biomechanics as a result of low and high myopic correction performed with Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE, employing the Visumax laser, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena Germany) compared to Femtosecond LASIK (FS200 & EX500 lasers, Alcon Surgical, Ft. Worth, TX) and to Femtosecond LASIK concurrent with corneal cross-linking (LASIK+CXL).

Setting:

LaserVision.gr Clinical and Research Eye Institute, Athens, Greece

Methods:

30 human donor corneas formed six groups (n=5 each). Simulated low (-3.00D, groups-A, -B, -C) and high (-8.00D, groups-D, -E, -F) myopic corrections were performed: Group-A -3.00D SMILE, group-B -3.00D LASIK, group-C -3.00D LASIK+CXL, group-D -8.00D SMILE, group-E -8.00D LASIK, group-F -8.00D LASIK+CXL. The corneas in groups-C & -F additionally received concurrent CXL with saline-diluted (0.10%) riboflavin instilled on the stroma, irradiated with high-irradiance UV-A through the repositioned flap. Ex-vivo transverse biaxial resistance tensile strength measurements were performed; biomechanical effects were assessed via stress-strain and Young’s shear modulus. Subsequently, the specimens were subjected to enzymatic digestion resistance tests (Collagenase digestion).

Results:

Low myopia results: Biomechanical shear modulus at 10% strain was 4.2±3.2MPa in group-A, 3.9±2.5MPa in group-B and 6.8±2.9MPa in group-C. Enzymatic Digestion: Time to dissolution was 195±19min in group-A, 189±27min in group-B and 320±34min in group-C. High myopia results: Biomechanical shear modulus at 10% strain was 3.7±2.1MPa in group-D, 2.9±2.2MPa in group-E and 4.5±2.9MPa in group-F. Enzymatic Digestion: Time to dissolution was 155±17min in group-D, 129±37min in group-E and 175±44min in group-F. Biomechanical and enzymatic digestion results were statistically significant between SMILE and LASIK for high myopia; between LASIK+CXL and SMILE and LASIK for both low and high myopia.

Conclusions:

SMILE and LASIK appear to result in comparable biomechanical changes for low myopia; in high myopia LASIK results in reduced biomechanics. Incorporation of concurrent CXL in LASIK appears to provide significant increase in underlying corneal stromal rigidity.

Financial Disclosure:

NONE

Back to previous