Copenhagen 2016 Registration Programme Exhibitor Information Virtual Exhibition Satellite Meetings Glaucoma Day 2016 Hotel Star Alliance
title

10 - 14 Sept. 2016, Bella Center, Copenhagen, Denmark

This Meeting has been awarded 27 CME credits

 

escrs app advert yo advert

Comparative study between preoperative power calculations and outcomes using intraoperative aberrometry

Search Title by author or title

Session Details

Session Title: Cataract Surgery Equipment/Instrumentation/Surgical Devices II

Session Date/Time: Monday 12/09/2016 | 17:00-18:30

Paper Time: 17:06

Venue: Hall C1

First Author: : M.Breen USA

Co Author(s): :    R. Cionni                    

Abstract Details

Purpose:

To evaluate post-operative (21-35 day) mean absolute value of prediction error (MAVPE) and mean absolute error (MAE) distribution after surgical procedures either using intraoperative aberrometry to guide IOL power selection or the calculated pre-operative power calculation.

Setting:

Prospective, multicenter, masked (to treatment and IOL type) evaluator study.

Methods:

Subjects (n=162) were analyzed for this prospective, multicenter, masked (to treatment and IOL type) evaluator study. Data related to pre-operative IOL power and predicted postoperative spherical equivalent and post-operative mean absolute value of the prediction error were collected and analyzed.

Results:

MAVPE Pre-op power was 0.35D ± 0.37 and MAVPE using intraoperative aberrometry was 0.29D ± 0.26 (p=0.04). Absolute pre-op prediction error distribution versus the distribution of power error following procedures using intraoperative aberrometry was as follows: ≤0.25D, 46% v 57%; ≤0.50D, 76% v 85%; ≤0.75D, 90% v 96%; ≤1.00D, 97% v 97%. The difference at ≤ 0.50 D was statistically significant (p=0.035)

Conclusions:

The use of intraoperative aberrometry reduced MAVPE power and the distribution of absolute power errors also shifted to lower errors compared to pre-operative power predictions.

Financial Disclosure:

... is employed by a for-profit company with an interest in the subject of the presentation, ... research is funded, fully or partially, by a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented, ... receives consulting fees, retainer, or contract payments from a company producing, developing or supplying the product or procedure presented

Back to previous